RSS

Category Archives: Voter Fraud

It’s Official: I Was Disenfranchised in the 2008 Presidential Election

If one person votes illegally it cancels out my vote.  It’s as if I didn’t participate in the electoral process at all.  If two people vote fraudulently then it’s as if both you and I didn’t participate.

Virginia just passed a Voter ID bill this year in an attempt to ensure the sanctity of the process, against stiff opposition from Democrats, who howled that having to prove one’s identity in order to vote disenfranchises the undocumented.

The new law is designed so that the undocumented voter casts a provisional ballot which is only counted if the voter validates their identity after the fact.

Here’s what the Washington Post had to say about the new legislation…

Studies have shown that voters who lack identification tend to be disproportionately elderly, young, poor and black. That means the legislation was blatantly anti-democratic as well as anti-Democratic.

I just love the construct, “Studies have shown….”  Studies performed by whom, exactly?  By the NAACP?  Think Progress?  People for the American Way?  Organizing for America?

One can’t buy Sudafed, fill a prescription, cash a check, buy liquour or smokes, travel by air, or perform as a functioning adult without identification. 

Another Democrat argument in Virginia has been that there is no evidence of voter fraud in Virginia.

Not so fast. There IS evidence and prosecutions are taking place.

The Richmond Times-Dispatch’s lead story today is about arrests being made for voter fraud committed in the 2008 election.

As Virginia legislators hotly debated a voter ID bill that narrowly passed the General Assembly, many were unaware of a state police investigation that, so far, has resulted in charges against 38 people statewide for voter fraud. Warrants have been obtained for a 39th person who can’t be located.

A majority of those cases already have resulted in convictions, and 26 additional cases are still being actively investigated nearly 3½ years after the state Board of Elections forwarded more than 400 voter and election fraud allegations from 62 cities and counties to Virginia State Police for individual investigation.

 

 

So Democrats can claim disenfranchisement, but we now have evidence that you and I were ACTUALLY disenfranchised as a direct result of Democrat incalcitrance, calculation and connivance.

The RTD story focuses on convicted felons voting without having had their voting rights restored, as required by law.

This part of the Voter Registration form was quite clear.

But aside from the felons, the old law allowed those without ID to cast regular votes after signing an affidavit affirming their identity and signing such affidavit fraudulently was a felony. Felonies are committed every hour of every day in Virginia with premeditation, when criminals weigh the probabilty and consequence of discovery and prosecution versus the gain to be made by the illegal activity.

Honestly, although I appreciate the efforts of the GA on the new Voter ID law, I feel it doesn’t go nearly far enough and here’s why and what I’d have preferred to see. You see, with the sworn affidavit it is impossible to find coordinated vote stealing operations as people are using death notices from the paper to vote unchallenged, multiple times across multiple voting precincts and their chances of getting caught are minimal. Especially in large urban areas.

I’d prefer to retain the sworn affidavit, but add to that the requirement that a photo be taken of the voter. That’s the only way to actually find the perpetrators of coordinated voter fraud and bring them to justice. I like the new law as it does put mechanisms in place to prevent fraud, but I like my idea better, where the opportunity to conduct criminal ‘business as usual’ is met with dire consequences to the perps and tied to the political party that engineered the operation.

But for now, detering their activity is sufficient.

I was disenfranchised in the 2008 election. I want it stopped.

I suspect that the Obama administration will go after Virginia’s efforts to legitimize the vote and Voter ID bills are being attacked across the nation as Democrats realize that they cannot win legitimately.

Next time you run into one of your Democrat legislators ask them why they stand for policies that disenfranchise you.

 

Obama’s Money Laundering Operation

This video is breathtaking.

A major hat tip to commenter Linda for bringing this incredible video to my attention.  She runs a blog called NoOneOfAnyImport and it seems that she has seriously undersold herself with that name.  What you have here is vitally important and needs to go viral.  Not sure if DTN is the platform.  But maybe it can provide a little boost.

I made a throwaway post about the amount of spam email begging for money that I get from the Obama operation last week.  But Linda points us to a video where the Obamafia have suspended credit card security, allow multiple names for the same card. allow foreign addresses and will take funds from virtually anyone, including Nidal Hassan.  The video also shows that Mitt and Rick are playing by the rules.

Watch this, make your own conclusions and get back to me.  And her.

I would characterize this as UNBELIEVABLE, but it isn’t.  Not one little bit.  America, your republic is under siege from lawless thugs, in case you didn’t already know.

 

Occupy Unmasked

This spring, Citizens United will be releasing a new movie called ‘Occupy Unmasked’, which will blow the lid off of Barack Obama’s Goon Squad, which he unleashed against CPAC over the last two days.  Working with Andrew Breitbart, Steve Bannon, and two reformed leftists, Brandon Darby and Lee Stranahan, the very heart of the Occupy/ACORN movement and it’s direct ties to this thug president will be exposed to the nation.

They are describing the feel of this project as a War Movie and after witnessing what happened at CPAC I think they’re spot on.

Watch the trailer and discussion.

Part One

Part Two

These are very dangerous and evil people.  They disrupted CPAC several times like good little totalitarians, unsuccessfully trying to stifle our 1st amendment rights.

The campaign to re-elect this president will be one of the most violent, if not the most violent, in American history.  Know your enemy.

P.S.  I will sift through the rest of my videos to find and put up how the ACORN/Occupy movement is organized into teams as described by Brandon Darby.  The anarchist left has been organizing for decades, which sounds like an oxymoron, but it’s true.  We conservatives are woefully unprepared and somewhat ignorant about what is headed our way.  Obama and his anarchist, leftist buddies are a threat to the Republic.

 

 

The NLRB and Labor Unions, The Unholy Alliance Continues

Each and every day for the past two weeks, I’ve seen the following message when I log into the website of our company’s payroll and benefits provider:

Please note that the NLRB recently communicated the following information regarding a new posting requirement.
Mandatory Federal (NLRB) Update – Poster Pending

The National Labor Relations Board has issued a Final Rule requiring most private-sector employers to notify employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act by posting a notice.

Employers must also post the notice on an intranet or an internet site if personnel rules and policies are customarily posted there. The rule will take effect on November 14, 2011.

The posting has not yet been released; the NLRB states it will be released on or before November 1, 2011. When the posting is released, posters will be made available to all clients. Further details to follow.

For those of you who haven’t stepped foot inside the employee lounge or personnel office lately, let me clarify this for you. No doubt you’ve seen the numerous posters covering topics from Minimum Wage to Employee Rights, etc. (Now in both English and Spanish for those of you who refuse to speak the language of the country that you are living and working in). But let me not get off topic here. This is nothing more than the National Labor Relations Board, a FEDERAL GOVERNMENT entity, working hand-in-hand with the Unions that put Barack Hussein Obama and the vast majority of Democrats into their Senate and Congressional offices, both nationally and locally. This is the NLRB doing their part to reward the Unions for their continued support of Leftist Progressive Liberal Agendas by PROMOTING and ENCOURAGING private sector employees to rise up and form a Union in their workplace.

What Obama cannot get passed in Congress (Card Check comes immediately to mind), he will find a way to pass through some other backdoor method. The Unions are failing everywhere except for in the Public Sector. Why? Because everyone with an IQ over 11 knows that the Union does nothing for them while lining the pockets of the Union Leaders and ensuring that Liberals continue to win elections and perpetuate the cycle of Union dues paying for Liberals’ campaigns, Liberals win and reward the Union leaders with more legislation and regulation favorable to Unions. What about the Union members that don’t support those Liberal candidates or incumbents? No soup for you!

 

Bob Etheridge puts North Carolina-2 in a headlock

It’s what Etheridge does by nature.

Dave C. warned you and now it has been confirmed, Etheridge is demanding a recount.  Here’s an email I just got from Renee Ellmers’ campaign…

Dear Supporter,

Election night, after the ten counties in my district had reported their votes, I led Bob Etheridge by 2,100 votes. (That number is crucial because under North Carolina law Congressman Etheridge is not entitled to an ‘automatic recount’ if he trails by more than 1% – or 1,888 votes.)

Then, yesterday afternoon – unexpectedly – the vote totals changed. The State Board of Elections reported my lead had dropped to 1,600 votes. Two hours later Bob Etheridge announced he intended to call for a recount.

As a result, last night my campaign began hiring attorneys – eleven attorneys in all. One in each county to monitor each recount and an attorney to work with the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

Right now, our best estimate of the minimum cost we face is $50,000. But, of course, my campaign spent every penny we had before the election.

Please help if you can.  I did.  She beat him fair and square.

UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE

Who are you?

 2,214 110 year olds voted in North Carolina this year in either early voting or by mail. There was also a 154 year old and a 160 year old. I’m sure there is no fraud there.

 

Harrah’s Bosses Put Squeeze on Employees to Vote in Pro-Reid Effort

Harrah’s Bosses Put Squeeze on Employees to Vote in Pro-Reid Effort – By Elizabeth Crum – Battle ’10 – National Review Online.

More Union strong-arm tactics to steal an election.

 

Tags:

Battle for Alaska: Men in Black Edition

Yesterday an Alaskan Superior Court Judge dealt incumbent Senator Leeza MooKowSkee a severe blow by not allowing election officials the ability to provide voters with information on the write-in candidates.

Fast forward to today and that ruling was overruled by the Alaska Supreme Court while you slept.

Is the Alaska Division of Elections acting as advocates for the Senator?

The high court ruled quickly after attorneys for the state Division of Elections petitioned for a review of a ruling issued earlier Wednesday by Anchorage Superior Court Judge Frank A. Pfiffner.

We’re 5 days before the election and lots of very dubious events are happening not just in Alaska, but because of Court rulings in Arizona on voter ID requirements, Harry Reid’s son and the SEIU seem to be conspiring to steal the election in Nevada, strange ballot episodes in North Carolina and other peculiarities are occurring.

 

AZ Gov. Jan Brewer to Neil Cavuto

“Arizona is under assault from the national Government.” 

First it was their Immigration Law.  Now, their voter ID  has been struck down.  Both by the Ninth Circuit, btw.

She just said it so there is nothing to link yet.

I’d say she’s right, but I would add that ALL Americans are under assault by their National Government.

 

Si’ Se Puede Vote En Arizona Sin Documentation Court Strikes Down State Requirements For ID When Registering

Today the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down an Arizona law which required either a picture ID or two forms of ID without a picture because in their opinion it is a discriminatory or onerous registration requirement. The law, which was passed by voter referendum in 2004  as proposition 200, was enacted to provide a minimal requirement of eligibility.

In a split decision, the court cited the supremacy clause and claimed the Arizona law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act  passed in 1993 . This is the Federal Law that Cloward and Piven lobbied Clinton to pass known as the “Motor Voter Act” . The three judge panel included Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, temporarily sitting by designation, and Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta, with chief judge Alex Kozinski dissenting. Arizona argued that the law was not in conflict as the requirements were not overly burdensome or discriminatory.

The Court referred to  the NVRA requirement that each state “shall establish procedures to register” voters for federal elections according to the NVRA’s three methods. The first is the motor voter method and it restricts the state from requiring any additional documentation than necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and to enable the state to assess the eligibility of the applicant. The second method requires registration by mail using the federal form. Finally the third method is to make in person voter registration available in various public offices and buildings with an emphasis on targeting  “the poor and persons with disabilities who do not have driver’s licenses and will not come into contact with” motor vehicle agencies.

It would appear that the court was most concerned with the second or mail in Federal form method. The Arizona law required; 

The form used for the registration of electors shall contain . . . [a] statement that the applicant shall submit evidence of United States citizenship with the application and that the registrar shall reject the application if no evidence of citizenship is attached.

The court claims that the  NVRA only requires that it must inform the applicant as to every eligibility requirement “including citizenship” and require the applicant to attest, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant meets each requirement.  The form “may not include any requirement for notarization or other formal authentication.” In other words if you attest that you are an eligible citizen that is good enough and by informing you that lying about this is against the law those ineligible non-citizens will not register to vote.

I understand that decades ago some states and localities may have purposely created a confusing and burdensome maze to go through in order to register to vote in an effort to suppress the vote but I think the current decision and possibly the NVRA have gone way too far. In my opinion the NRVA has transformed from a protective law which enabled those who would otherwise be disenfranchised to vote into a vehicle to enable fraudulant voting. This decision is an obvious lurch to assist organizations like ACORN in their effort to register every person, regardless of qualifications, to vote. When Arizona passed Proposition 200 it was to protect the integrity of their elections not to disenfranchise any eligible voter.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on October 26, 2010 in Liberal Courts, politics, Voter Fraud

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 442 other followers

%d bloggers like this: